SIFPrime
Loading SIFPrime workspace
Preparing the latest fund data and research view.
Loading SIFPrime workspace
Preparing the latest fund data and research view.
Two SIFs, same strategy category, vastly different outcomes. Discover why risk management made all the difference in January 2026.
Both funds employ Long-Short Equity strategies but with dramatically different risk profiles
ITI Mutual Fund
Conservative approach with superior capital preservation
Monthly Return
-1.35%
Daily Vol
0.18%
Annual Vol
2.80%
Max Drawdown
-1.35%
Win Rate
31.6%
Quant Mutual Fund
Higher volatility with bigger swings both ways
Monthly Return
-5.02%
Daily Vol
0.87%
Annual Vol
13.88%
Max Drawdown
-7.14%
Win Rate
42.1%
Indexed to 100 on December 31, 2025 — Watch how risk translates to real performance
Tracking weekly returns reveals the consistency gap
Week 4 was brutal for both funds!
QSIF dropped -3.08% while Diviniti lost -0.93%. Even in the worst week, Diviniti's conservative approach limited damage by 70%.
Numbers don't lie — see who wins each metric
| Metric | QSIF Ex-Top 100 | Diviniti | Insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Return | -5.02% | -1.35%✓ | Diviniti outperformed by 73% |
| Daily Volatility | 0.87% | 0.18%✓ | 5x difference in risk! |
| Annualized Volatility | 13.88% | 2.80%✓ | Much calmer ride |
| Max Drawdown | -7.14% | -1.35%✓ | Better capital protection |
| Win Rate | 42.1%✓ | 31.6% | But bigger losses offset wins |
Diviniti's conservative approach preserved 73% more capital than QSIF. In volatile markets, controlling downside is more valuable than chasing upside.
QSIF showed 0.87% daily volatility vs Diviniti's 0.18%. That's a 5x difference in risk for funds in the same category!
Both funds moved in the same direction 75% of the time. Holding both offers limited diversification benefit.
Diviniti's lower volatility profile offers better downside protectionand capital preservation. Ideal for risk-averse investors.
QSIF's higher volatility could translate to better upside in favorable markets, but comes with significant drawdown risk.
SIFs require sophisticated understanding — not all long-short strategies are equal. Implementation and risk controls make all the difference.
0.81
Correlation Coefficient
75%
Same Direction Days
Strong correlation suggests both funds are exposed to similar market factors. The difference lies in position sizing and risk management execution.
Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future returns. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully before investing. The analysis is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.